[MGK]⋙ Download Gratis The Expected One A Novel Book One of the Magdalene Line Kathleen McGowan 9780743299428 Books

The Expected One A Novel Book One of the Magdalene Line Kathleen McGowan 9780743299428 Books

Download As PDF : The Expected One A Novel Book One of the Magdalene Line Kathleen McGowan 9780743299428 Books

The Expected One A Novel Book One of the Magdalene Line Kathleen McGowan 9780743299428 Books

This book is not easy to assess. In a way it is a novel, but the postscript directly turns it into something else. Had it not been for this postscript, I would have awarded this book a higher rating. It may be somewhat verbose and predictable, but it was a pleasant read, without any real tension or love interests.

Towards the end we are finally introduced to the “Gospel of Mary Magdalene”, which is exactly that, the gospel of Mary Magdalene, according to the author. The central theme of the four gospels, i.e. Jesus’ vicarious sacrifice, is absent. Also absent is any in-depth knowledge of Jewish first century culture. This is a pity, for it takes away from the believability of this ‘gospel’. The author obviously did a lot of research in Cathari history, but is looks as if she relied on Sunday school memories as far as the background to the gospels is concerned.

As did Dan Brown, this author claims that the gospels were extensively edited in the time of Constantine. This, if it were true, would be rather convenient. There is actually no evidence for it, and plenty against it. In my observation it is not the bible believing people who are one-eyed and ignore historical evidence, but rather those who want to debunk the scriptures.

Be that as it may, this book certainly held my attention. It was also, at times, quite funny, but I was not always sure whether the humour was intended or not.


Tags : The Expected One: A Novel (Book One of the Magdalene Line) [Kathleen McGowan] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. When journalist Maureen Paschal begins to research her new book, she discovers that she is destined to play a key role in an epic international quest to gain control of a priceless series of scrolls,Kathleen McGowan,The Expected One: A Novel (Book One of the Magdalene Line),Touchstone,0743299426,Religious - General,Thrillers - General,AMERICAN MYSTERY & SUSPENSE FICTION,Fiction,Fiction - Espionage Thriller,Fiction General,Fiction Religious,Fiction Thrillers General,Fiction-Coming of Age,Fiction-Thriller,GENERAL,General Adult,Monograph Series, 1st,Thrillers,United States

The Expected One A Novel Book One of the Magdalene Line Kathleen McGowan 9780743299428 Books Reviews

Why the author refers to Jesus by name used by Arabic speaking Moslems? why not his original Hebrew, or Aramaic name, or is she wwanted to use Arbic form, that why not the version used by Arabic speaking Christians? This book was a huge disapointment.Wanted to like it, but...Mary Magdalene deserves a better treatment.Instead of giving a plot summary, I am pointing out author's mistakes, but not all of them, just sampling, too many of those, would make a chapter pointing them out.

First issue the research. For ex. art history the author assumes that any Mary in red robes is Mary Magdalene, even if she looks like Madonna, Virgin Mary. Author argues that Madonnas are dressed in blue only. Here the Kathleen McGowan shows insufficient researchif she paid more attention to art history she would know that Virgin was dressed in navy blue, other blues, grey, red, white, imperial purple, red robe and blue mantle over, etc. It depended on time, the school, and aspect. For example Madonna in her humility aspect was dressed in blue. Red symbolized charity. Etc. etc.etc. McGowan info about identifying MM in any occasion of Mary dressed in red is spreading misinformation.Colors were quite a complex issue, and narrowing the iconography down as author did isn't historically accurate, and is ignorant. Iconography is not so simplistic to just identify Virgin Mary because the figure is dressed in blue, or Mary Magdalene because she wears red. Not so simple as the author and some people assume.

Or the ring given to Maureen McGowan describes it as something special. Yet deducting from the description, it is a common pilgrim ring, this type was produced en masse during the Middle Ages.

Regular history, sample example the Borgias were sweet people after all, just vilified? Really? Also Marie Antoinette saying "let them eat cake!" It is an old gossip, most likely a piece of hostile propaganda, I give credit to the author, yet what is translated as "cake" in English is brioche in French, a different kind of baked stuff, not a cake, it is like sweet bread, if you are no familiar with it. French quote is "S'ils n'ont plus de pain, qu'ils mangent de la brioche." Also Marie Antoinette as the Shepherdess, because there was a fashion in Europe to live bucolic life. Pastoral life style, highly idealized and romanticized was continuation of classical tradition in Europe.Need to research history, not jump to conclusions because it is convenient.

Writing is quite like some old fashioned romance, spiked with many words like " magnificent," wonderful," on an on. The part of writings which deal with older material are better, but somehow read like Sylvia Browne's claims to retro-cognition. Browne also wrote a historical novel about Jesus.The Expected One reads like Harlequin romance of an old fashion, like not belonging to this era, but to the times of corsets and fainting chairs and excessive affect in women. There are also some kitschy moments too. The main character is kind of weak, needs to have things explained to her, and of course is courted by an ultra rich aristocrat who lives in a castle provides a golden dress for the ball and there she is treated like a queen, as she is the shepherdess, the Expected One. Sorry, but it reads like a juvenile dream of unleashing the inner princes, quite a navel gazing ego trip.

Plot and hype as this book was selling with the hype of the author being the descendant of the lineage coming from Mary Magdalene and Jesus, and the author said that the novel is partially autobiographical some passages felt like if the author was weaving "here reader, I am the Shepherdess, the Expected One, the new leader!" Too much personal psychology revealed.Some passages were also lazy plotted instead of inventing some thrilling moments, the author just lets the expected one to find what she needs to find after having a revealing vision. Quite conveniant device for a writer writing a thriller, but disappointing for a reader. Ending unfulfilling.

Assumptions for the name "Paschal," as the author makes a big deal out of it in the book, and it was part of "proven facts" while marketing the book.

This name (also the form Pascal), is common in France, also in Southern France and the West of Italy. It derives from the first name Pascal. Like the last names such as Davis, or Simon, etc. come from first names. Pascal means "born on Easter." Pascha is Easter. But Pascal being really a Cathar name in particular? No.You find in the Cathar country names like Bonhomme, this really a Cathar name!
Poor Mary Magdalene. But I hope the skills of the author will develop. I read the Book of Love and, and was better written. So, maybe the last book is much better?

This book being offensive? Yes, for insulting readers' intelligence, not for supposedly "controversial" subject matter. It makes quite high rolling claims, in reality is catering to people who are not well versed in art history, iconography, cultural history.
This book had been recommended to me by a tour guide of 'ancient mysteries'while visiting France. I had read 'Holy Blood, Holy Grail' by
Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, who also uncover the theme and meaning
behind certain well known symbols. The mention of sacred geometry and ley
lines where cathedrals have been built. The masacre of the 'Cathars'at Montsegur. The mention of Freemason's. (French and Scot's) I am enjoying
Kathleen McGowan's writing style and story telling. This book is engaging.
I will buy another by same author, when I complete this one. She has done alot of research on the subject and discloses information that I did not know. I highly recommend to anyone who's interested in esoterica and ancient mysteries.
Kept me interested and felt like this was more a work of fact than fiction.
Very healing for me too on profound levels.
This was recommended to me. The friend said she couldn't put it down. Mine was not the same experience. I found this book to be average at best. I did not like the main character. She seemed egotistical and rather flat. The book was so bogged down with pseudo-mystery, as in - something mysterious is happening but we're not going to tell you yet. Problem was I didn't care. It actually reminded me of a Scooby doo episode. You know how at the end there was always a post mortem on events and a foiled plan by bad guys? The actual method of writing was good, but the story just lacked anything interesting. The best parts were the flashbacks and visions the main character had. I will not be buying anymore books in this series.
I bought this as a gift. I already have my own copy, which I loved, and I went on to read the other two books in the series. She really brings Mary Magdalene to life and not at all in a dull way. The book has mystery, intrigue, and it's a page turner. As for the comparison with Dan Browns book which came out around the same time - well I loved that one, too. There were similarities but they really weren't the same and I think Kathleen McGowan did a nice job of expressing the value of the feminine. Loved it!
This book is not easy to assess. In a way it is a novel, but the postscript directly turns it into something else. Had it not been for this postscript, I would have awarded this book a higher rating. It may be somewhat verbose and predictable, but it was a pleasant read, without any real tension or love interests.

Towards the end we are finally introduced to the “Gospel of Mary Magdalene”, which is exactly that, the gospel of Mary Magdalene, according to the author. The central theme of the four gospels, i.e. Jesus’ vicarious sacrifice, is absent. Also absent is any in-depth knowledge of Jewish first century culture. This is a pity, for it takes away from the believability of this ‘gospel’. The author obviously did a lot of research in Cathari history, but is looks as if she relied on Sunday school memories as far as the background to the gospels is concerned.

As did Dan Brown, this author claims that the gospels were extensively edited in the time of Constantine. This, if it were true, would be rather convenient. There is actually no evidence for it, and plenty against it. In my observation it is not the bible believing people who are one-eyed and ignore historical evidence, but rather those who want to debunk the scriptures.

Be that as it may, this book certainly held my attention. It was also, at times, quite funny, but I was not always sure whether the humour was intended or not.